Search for: "D. O. B." Results 6661 - 6680 of 7,688
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 7:00 pm by Julio César Córdoba
Se trata del mismo comentario al fallo SCBA, 04/02/09, B., S. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:31 am by thelawprofessor
Recchia, Jr., Joel Rivera, James Sanders, Jr., Larry B. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:16 pm by sevach
Para Sevach, la situación actual de déficit de financiación universitaria constituye un fenómeno de irresponsabilidad global. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:05 pm by dmk
Best Blawg About Legal Blawgging – Kevin O’Keefe’s Real Lawyers Have Blogs 7. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:05 pm by dmk
Best Blawg About Legal Blawgging - Kevin O'Keefe's Real Lawyers Have Blogs 7. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v Unilever plc & Ors (IPKat)… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Cole (Georgetown), IntLawGrrl guest/alumna Mary Ellen O'Connell (Notre Dame) (left), Stephen I. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:31 pm
” Este discurso bélico permitió la confección de un decreto de reformas constitucionales que, desde el día 18 de junio de 2008, comienza a reducir el catalogo de Derechos Fundamentales del gobernado al modificar el párrafo segundo del artículo 16 constitucional y establecer como requisitos para librar una orden de aprehensión que obren -diferente a acreditar- datos que establecen que se ha cometido un hecho sancionado por la… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:32 am by Gustavo Arballo
La ordenanza dice que día por día, la autoridad de aplicación va a decidir a las ocho de la mañana si se va a poder estacionar o no en esa fecha. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:35 am by gmlevine
“Knowledge of Complainant’s rights is an essential part of the bad faith analysis,” Russell Frey d/b/a edHelper v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
The FDIC’s motion papers explain, in footnote 4, that the FDIC sent the letter to the bank’s primary and first level excess D&O insurers, but not to the second and third level excess D&O insurers, because the second and third level excess insurer’s policies "contain a regulatory exclusion. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 10:00 pm by sevach
Ira y dolor pasan, y la amistad queda; y yo estoy seguro de que el día de mañana será el propio Carnelutti quien se arrepentirá de lo que ha escrito”. [read post]