Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:31 am
The American rule contrasts with the English Rule, under which the losing party pays the prevailing party’s attorneys’ fees. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
However, Group Chimiche Tunisien countered this, stating that the July contract contained no clause for London arbitration and therefore the dispute could be resolved in the courts of Tunisia.Midgulf submitted that the parties had contracted in July on the basis of Midgulf's offer, which stated that jurisdiction and arbitration were to be in accordance with the June contract which provided for English law and London arbitration, which was accepted orally. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:46 am
Applying Article 15, the question whether the English arbitration should continue or be discontinued by reason of the insolvency is to be determined by English law.Josef Syska & Others v Vivendi Universal & Others illustrates how a court will interpret the Regulation. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:44 am
Its assessment, however, would be governed by English law as a matter of procedure.The decisions in Knight v AXA and Maher v Groupama are identical and show that foreign insurers can have a claim brought against them in an English court for a tort in a foreign jurisdiction and that damages will be assessed by reference to English law. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 10:08 am
Petitioners point to the historical rejection of the English "manner of manufacture" in favor of the broader Constitutional "and useful Arts" as support for protection of processes being a seminal Constitutional right. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:41 am
In Fennessey,v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:12 am
In the United States, particularly, as early as in Guth v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:49 am
" Frew v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 7:03 am
The Article concludes in Part V by examining the barriers to citizenship and immigrant integration that are created by the interplay among national citizenship norms, state, and local integration policies, and the norms and dynamics internal to immigrant communities themselves. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:57 am
” (United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:00 pm
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court in Sprint Communications Co LP v APCC Services Inc divided on the question whether an assignee for collection of federal debts satisfied Article III standing. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:41 am
There was no rule of construction and no rule of law which stated that a reinsurer must respond to every valid claim under the insurance irrespective of the terms of the reinsurance.The most important aspect to the decision was the way in which the Lords distinguished the present case from the decision of the House of Lords in Vesta v Butcher [1989] AC 852. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
In Petroleum Pipe Americas Co., v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:26 am
A press release in English is available here. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:02 am
It does not appear to address the more fundamental debate taking place on these issues.It is also perhaps worth recalling that the English courts recently strayed into this discussion (perhaps unknowingly) in Patel v Allos [2008]. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 8:12 am
Consequently, Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 5:21 pm
” In O’Brien v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
" Phillips v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:25 pm
Re: United States v. [read post]
