Search for: "FIRST BENEFITS INC" Results 6661 - 6680 of 12,594
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2019, 9:51 am by Paul Willetts
Advanis Inc., 2009 CanLII 23869 (ON SC).For example, if an employer dismissed a worker and then, while acknowledging its obligation to maintain benefits coverage, simply refuses to do so, the worker may successfully argue that the employer should be denied the protection of a clause with which it refused to comply.As such, it is important for employers to make sure they are diligent in meeting their contractual commitments at the time of termination.5. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
The first half covers what most employers think of in workers compensation. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:20 pm by David Jensen
"A: I have no financial interest in StemCells Inc. or any of the individuals or firms that would benefit from approval of those awards by the ICOC. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:20 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer, a noted Texas-based employee benefits and employment lawyer Board Certified in Labor & Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, will discuss HIPAA and other privacy risks and risk management strategies for employers, health and employee benefit plan sponsors and their administrators at the Southwest Benefits Association/IRS Plan Administrator Skills Workshops to be held February 25 in Dallas and March 4 in Houston. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:02 am
None of these cases was decided with the benefit of the Supreme Court's decision in Reigel. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:14 am by Sean Wajert
Bridgeport Machines, Inc., 249 F.3d 672 (7th Cir.2001); In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc., 51 F.3d 1293 (7th Cir.1995). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  Workers had fair wages, worked fair hours, and received fair benefits. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:33 am by Amy Howe
On Monday, October 7, the first Monday in October, the justices of the Supreme Court will return to the bench for the first oral arguments of the new term. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
Supreme Court of California, July 14, 2008 Silicon Valley Taxpayers Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:48 pm by Jonathan Bailey
The consent decrees haven’t been without benefit to ASCAP and BMI. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:48 pm by Jonathan Bailey
The consent decrees haven’t been without benefit to ASCAP and BMI. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am by Eric Goldman
Case citation: Aliign Activation Wear, LLC v. lululemon athletica Canada Inc., 2021 WL 3117239 (C.D. [read post]