Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 10,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2024, 3:54 am
For instance, reviewing 130,000 documents might take 27 days manually, ten days using TAR 1, 18-20 days with TAR 2 and 3, but only about five days with generative AI. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm
The en banc decision (found here) is not directly a ruling about whether the Constitution does or does not tolerate race-conscious admissions to public colleges. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
Finally, individuals with taxable income over $1 million will be taxed $91,525 plus 10.75 percent on any amount over $1 million. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
Habeas remains there, as it does here, to make sure that government officials follow the law. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565 had an occasion to comprehensively deal with the scope and ambit of the concept of anticipatory bail. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 2:21 pm
To carry that burden, the government must show that the challenged law "(1) 'advances important governmental interests unrelated to the suppression of free speech' and (2) 'does not burden substantially more speech than necessary to further those interests.'" To establish that the law advances important governmental interests, the government "must do more than simply posit the existence of the disease sought to be cured. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:03 pm
We rejected Jimenez’s arguments that (1) the Agreement is not subject to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”)[2] because post-injury agreements between a seaman and his employer are invalid under Section 5 of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act; (2) the Agreement does not meet the standards applied in Garret v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
” First, does the justice write a lot of majority opinions? [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:19 am
(I do not know why the ABA website does not also list Atlanta’s John Marshall’s non-compliance letter.) [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 11:49 am
Not unlike the 3/1, 5/1, 7/1 and other variations on this theme that also have been around for years. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:02 pm
Third, on 1 April 2011, there was judgment in Awdry, Bailey & Douglas v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 785 (QB) (1 April 2011). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The fees represent most of his annual income.[2] Heller started a class proceeding against Uber in 2017 for violations of the Employment Standards Act.[3] Uber brought a motion to stay the class proceeding in favour of arbitration in the Netherlands. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm
” April 1, 2019: Writing in The Hill, John Solomon calls for greater scrutiny into the Biden’s activity in Ukraine and declares that an investigation into Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian dealings would be a “nightmare” for the elder Biden’s 2020 candidacy. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The scientific literature does better. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
Hertz also argues that a headquarters test is consistent with the two policy goals underlying § 1332: (1) preserving a federal forum for out-of-state corporate defendants, who might otherwise face biased local courts; and (2) preventing local corporations from removing local controversies to federal court simply because they have incorporated in a different state. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 10:17 am
” It went on to conclude that it does. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
The Court noted that the complaint primarily sought to allege scienter on two grounds: (1) defendants’ access to financial information and (2) stock sales by insiders. [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:18 am
We believe [1] the exposure draft conflicts with the Code of Conduct, [2] misunderstands the Federalist Society, [3] applies a double standard, and [4] leads to troubling consequences. [5] The circumstances surrounding the issuance of the exposure draft also raise serious questions about the Committee's internal procedures and transparency. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
EO 11246 does not affect grants, and the new EO does not impact the administration of federal grants. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 9:36 am
The RESTORE ACT: 1. [read post]
