Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 13,530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
Authors select, arrange, and combine formal elements like line, color, notes, words. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 10:46 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a petition for rehearing en banc in Sissel v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
Consumer expectations should generally line up with law: a good in itself and encourages respect for law. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
Aereo follows a long line of cases about new tech asking whether judges should look inside the machine or just look at the inputs and outputs. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 3:32 pm
Following the IPKat's blogpost last week on the ongoing passing-off action between Gama Healthcare Ltd v Pal International Ltd. in which Gama objected that Pal's wet-wipe packaging would lead people to think it was theirs, this weblog ran a short, sweet sidebar poll to ask whether readers might be confused between the claimants' Clinell's packs and the defendants' Medipal ones.A gratifyingly large number of readers interrupted their holidays for at… [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
The world's a better place if there's a rule that's as bright line as possible. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:03 am
Lisa Ramsey: Line drawing: who do we ask? [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 10:30 am
This is precisely what Justice Clarence Thomas was criticizing when he wrote for the majority Holder v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” Branche v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:35 am
There's also a fine line between finding work (as Ms. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The legal question for the court in Devorah H. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
As a doctor and a libertarian, Rand Paul, of all people, should understand that. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 5:17 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:06 am
Parks, LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
(379 U.S. 29 (1964)) fixed a bright-line rule that a patentee cannot charge royalties for the use of its invention after the expiry of the patent. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm
The Guardian was next in line, and if anything it is worse for him. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
Summers v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
It is tempting to think of the plaintiffs in Evenwel v. [read post]
