Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 6661 - 6680 of 178,474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2023, 10:28 am by Howard Bashman
The post “The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Can’t Stop Falling for Phony Plaintiffs” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
” The plaintiffs seek relief under the US Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment, claiming their due process rights were violated because a placement in the STGMU does not require a hearing. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:59 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Defendant informed the detective that plaintiffs son had called and informed him that plaintiff had stolen and sold several pieces of jewelry, including a men’s Rolex watch. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:15 am by Law Office of Ray Garcia, P.A.
In this case, the business entity would be the defendant, and the owner would be the plaintiff. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:05 am by Jon Brodkin
The former executives' lawsuit filed in April said the company "has breached its obligations... by refusing to advance Plaintiffs' Expenses. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 8:52 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The plaintiff states allege that the program “amounts to the creation of a new visa program that allows hundreds of thousands of aliens to enter the United States who otherwise have no basis for doing so”. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Administrator
[…] [3] The defendant brings this motion to compel the plaintiff to answer questions that plaintiffs counsel objected to. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
s motion to dismiss the second cause of action – which sought a declaration that the restrictive covenant had been breached, together with $4 million in damages – the plaintiff appealed. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the factual allegations in the complaint, even as amplified by the plaintiffs’ evidentiary submissions in opposition to the defendants’ motion, were insufficient to establish that the defendants acted with intent to deceive the plaintiffs or the court (see Cordell Marble Falls, LLC v Kelly, 191 AD3d at 762; Michalic v Klat, 128 AD2d 505, 506; Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 636). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
  It held that the district court correctly dismissed plaintiff's Free Exercise claim because the zoning designation process is neutral and generally applicable. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
How does a Court assess a class action claim against a high-tech giant where the evidence is that the plaintiff reaffirmed the conditions of use numerous times in making her transactions in the world following the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal case in Uber Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 2:59 am
.), the court denied a Defendant’s Preliminary Objections to a Plaintiffs Complaint in which the Plaintiff alleged that he was injured when a large mirror fell on him in a business leased from the Defendant landowner. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 2:08 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
WSP Australia could look to WSP Structures for recoupment and was not the “proper plaintiff” in the claim against the insurers as alleged. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Baltimore line, plaintiffs have used various legal tactics, including filing complaints with the Federal Trade Commission for Green Guides violations. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:36 pm by Amy Howe
Wright, holding that plaintiffs could not challenge the Internal Revenue Service’s grant of tax-exempt status to racially discriminatory schools that their children did not attend, when the plaintiffs’ only allegation was that other students had been victims of racial discrimination. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:57 pm by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
Ohio Sept. 27, 2023) denied plaintiffs’ motion for court-authorized notice of bus drivers’ claims of alleged unpaid overtime wages … Continue reading "In The Latest Application of the Sixth Circuit’s Novel “Strong Likelihood” Standard, Ohio District Court Denies Plaintiffs’ Motion to Issue Notice of FLSA Overtime Lawsuit" [read post]
The consent decree includes four major provisions: the state is permanently enjoined from not including gender-affirming care in the state health plans, the state health plans must evaluate requests for coverage for gender-affirming treatments and surgeries the same as all other types of healthcare coverage, the state will no longer apply any statutes or rules that are in conflict with the consent decree and the state will pay the plaintiffs legal fees. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 12:18 pm by Lauren Guichard and Andrew Young
The court advised that the condition, size and location of the hazard are factors for consideration,but the plaintiffs subjective awareness of the condition has no bearing on the analysis. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:55 am by John Hochfelder
Finally, the jury also awarded plaintiff damages for future medical expenses in the sum of $1,800,000 (25 years); however, this award was reduced to $700,000 based upon the testimony of plaintiffs experts as to the cost of various items such as pain medication, doctor visits, epidural injections and physical therapy treatment. [read post]