Search for: "State v. Downs" Results 6661 - 6680 of 40,857
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Morris, contacted Your Harlow and demanded the whole story be taken down. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Unfortunately, when negotiations between the parties break down, letters of intent are often at the center of litigation.[2] In perhaps the most famous example of litigation around the enforceability of a letter of intent, Pennzoil won a judgment against Texaco for $10.5 billion, and Texaco was forced to seek bankruptcy protection.[3] Despite the legal risks, companies continue to use letters of intent. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Wang
Supreme Court’s decision in 2016 to strike down a Texas TRAP law in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:50 pm by Florian Mueller
Shortcomings should be addressed and I hope Democrats will be principled enough to do that in certain states. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Many leading civil procedure cases do involve discrimination, such as the hugely important Ashcroft v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
An innovative approach to harm reduction, says the Third Circuit, but also one that violates a federal law aimed at shutting down crack houses. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am by Andrew J. Grotto
Tasked with ensuring policy coordination between agencies, she was ultimately stuck in a position with, in her words, “almost nothing written down about what it should be,” disappointing many who had high expectations for her appointment and eventually leading to her resignation. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by James Romoser
Supreme Court probes FTC’s approach to seeking ill-gotten gains (Lawrence Hurley, Reuters) Supreme Court Decides Chicago v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:15 pm by Tia Sewell
Patrick McDonnell summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Collins v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am by Rui Dias
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
The California Supreme Court struck down the County’s practice of categorically determining that the issuance of all well permits that do not require a variance is ministerial. [read post]
The California Supreme Court struck down the County’s practice of categorically determining that the issuance of all well permits that do not require a variance is ministerial. [read post]