Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 6661 - 6680
of 12,945
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2014, 7:34 am
Mil-Spec Monkey, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:13 am
On the Profile page, [Olney’s] cell phone number was entered in the `Home Phone’ field. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:27 pm
According to the INA Section 203(b) states, in pertinent part, that: (1) Priority workers – visas shall first be made available… to qualified immigrants who are aliens described in any of the following sub-paragraphs (A) through (C): (A) Aliens with extraordinary – an alien is described in this sub-paragraph if- (i) The alien has extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletes which has been demonstrated by sustained… [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 11:24 am
In Methodist Health Centers v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:09 am
Moore v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Paroline v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
To deny Anonymous' request for a post-termination hearing was constitutionally infirm and, therefore, remittal of this matter is necessary for the completion of such administrative proceedings,” citing House v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 262 AD2d 929.* Although the phrase used in the decision is "be discharged from his position," such termination is not a pejorative dismissal as §73, in pertinent part, specifically provides that an individual… [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:10 pm
In the recent case of Seiden v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:41 am
Affirming summary judgment for an employer on the employee’s state law disability discrimination claim, the Eighth Circuit explained that his argument was foreclosed by a Missouri Supreme Court decision making it clear that the question is whether “an employer deliberately renders an employee’s working conditions so intolerable that the employee was forced to quit” (Noel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:30 pm
Moreover, even assuming, that the Court were to conclude that the relief that complainant seeks includes dissolution, the Court is guided by the reasoning in Tashenberg v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
As he explains in this post, this deeply detailed but well indexed–case that one of the IPKat’s favourite judges delivered last week deals with a patent in the technical field of Hepatitis C treatment. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 4:23 pm
In Oiye v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
” Riley at 26-27, citing Coolidge v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm
The decision in State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 2:00 am
The case is Hawaii Floriculture and Nursery Association v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:13 am
Similar to state and local sales and use taxes, motor fuel tax can often be a mine field for the unsuspecting business. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:35 am
The judgment is available here on BAILII, and the case is properly called Idenix Pharmaceutical, Inc v Gilead Sciences, Inc & Ors [2014] EWHC 3916 (Pat) (01 December 2014).The technical field is treatments for Hepatitis C; the specific area is nucleoside analogues having alleged activity against Hepatitis C Virus and other viruses of the Flaviviridae family. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:33 am
United States, decided by the Federal Circuit on March 14, 2014. [read post]
