Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 6661 - 6680 of 8,841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) There’s been much talk about the trial court decision in Mansour v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:16 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
United States District Court CIVIL OPINIONS Constitutional Law Right to bear arms A lawsuit alleging that the Wisconsin Gun Free School Zone Act violates the right to bear arms states a claim for relief. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  With all the tactical considerations that go into where a plaintiff files a suit, and where it ends up, we wouldn't put too much weight on the stats. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
 Les Éditions Écosociété Inc, 2010 ONCA 416 (per Weiler, Blair and Rouleau JJ.A) , both of which were argued before the Supreme Court of Canada this week. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:15 am by Mike Scarcella
It's unclear whether regulators will approve shrinking the number of national wireless operators in the United States from four to three. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:06 am by The Docket Navigator
However, [the witness later] testified under oath that he had made no efforts to travel to the United States for his deposition, had within his possession a five-year visa, and could travel to the United States at any time. . . . [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:18 pm by Lara
Yesterday, the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina ordered defendant Bright Builders, Inc. to pay $770,750.00 in damages for contributory trademark infringement as the result of a jury verdict against it for constructing and providing web hosting services to a company it knew to be infringing on third parties’ trademarks. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am by Stefanie Levine
Another forum seeing an increase in use is the United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that: [P]recedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors. [. . .] [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm by WIMS
And they'd be especially devastating for states like Kentucky and other coal states. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:09 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
MCG HEALTH, INC. d/b/a MCG Hospital, First Defendant, UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITEDHEALTHCARE OF GEORGIA, INC., Second Defendants.CIVIL ACTION NO. [read post]