Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 6661 - 6680 of 23,699
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
  Grand jury subpoenas, unlike trial subpoenas, may be served nationwide:  there are geographical limitations within the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by Joy Waltemath
Before the applicant presented her unopposed motion under FRCP 23(e), however, the United States Supreme Court decided Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am by Hayley Evans, Shannon Togawa Mercer
Chapter V of GDPR governs the legality of transfers of personal data to third countries and allows for the transfer of data to a third country when the EC decides that “a third country...ensures an adequate level of protection” or when there are appropriate safeguards in place. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 4:01 am by Administrator
The Owners, Strata Plan VR2122 v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 3:27 am by SHG
In that regard, the Legislature hereby declares its rejection of the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit’s opinion in Brooks v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:49 am by Frank Heft
§3583(h) in a case of first impression             In United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:33 am by John Floyd
United States applied the Brady Rule to impeachment evidence. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am by Jonathan Hafetz
United States (Al-Bahlul II), which upheld the petitioner’s conviction for conspiracy. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:31 am by Doorey
In the United States, the termination of the plaintiff in circumstances such as this would almost certainly be a violation of Section 7 of the NLRA. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 3:49 am
I've always liked Judge Sweet, not because I've followed him over the years, but because of one case he decided in the year when I worked in the same courthouse.In United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States, Chief Justice William Rehnquist, a strong law-and-order conservative, held for the Court that Miranda is a constitutional decision and would not be overruled. [read post]