Search for: "United States v. House" Results 6661 - 6680 of 12,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
Starbucks Secret menu hereCat Poop Coffee v Starbucks Coffee here (yes, you read that correctly) [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:09 pm by Corynne McSherry
We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy for those complaints last year and wer told that that office had no records (https://www.eff.org/document/eff-fioa-request-tech-bias-story-sharing-tool).Section 5 commands the Attorney General to convene a group to look at existing state laws and propose model state legislation to address unfair and deceptive practices by online platforms. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
  John Quincy Adams cited the anarchy as justification for the treaty of 1819 ceding Florida to the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:09 pm by Viking
  The interesting point is that in granting the third trial the appellate court relied on two cases, one of them being United States v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:23 am
Byrne discussed the United States Fair Housing Act and a recent decision regarding its application to 'companion animals'. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 1:56 pm
Concerning politics, consider these astute observations from (soon to be Professor) Greenhouse:Watching the back-and-forth between a state legislature and the Supreme Court of the United States had given me a real sense of the court as an active participant in the ceaseless American dialogue about constitutional values and priorities, not a remote oracle.... [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:18 am by Daniel Schwartz
United Technologies Corp. in 1999, that 31-51q was applied to private sector employees. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 2:05 pm
Concerning politics, consider these astute observations from (soon to be Professor) Greenhouse:Watching the back-and-forth between a state legislature and the Supreme Court of the United States had given me a real sense of the court as an active participant in the ceaseless American dialogue about constitutional values and priorities, not a remote oracle.... [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm by INFORRM
A public interest defence which could only be rebutted by proof of malice would not strike a fair balance (and, as the position in the United States shows, would not make reduce litigation or make it cheaper). [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 12:30 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
That was the question the Sixth Circuit had to answer in United States v. [read post]