Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 6681 - 6700 of 9,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2011, 9:25 pm by lawmrh
While the Arizona State Bar and state supreme court’s inquiry continues into possible ethics violations by former Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, meanwhile back at the ranch, Judicial Watch, a self-described “watchdog over our government, legal, and judicial systems,” also continues prosecuting its open records request concerning the records of Colorado Attorney Regulation Counsel John Gleason, the investigator hired by… [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:29 pm
Supreme Court decision in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:23 am
Arizona was issued in 1966 there have been hundreds of cases decided by the US Supreme Court which interpret the language and spirit of the Miranda decision, as it applies to new circumstances. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:23 am
Arizona was issued in 1966 there have been hundreds of cases decided by the US Supreme Court which interpret the language and spirit of the Miranda decision, as it applies to new circumstances. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:06 pm by Christine Dowling
Supreme Court vacated the Ninth's judgment and remanded the case in light of Florida v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:19 pm by Steve Hall
Court of Appeals today refused to back off its decision to grant habeas relief for a teenage mass murderer despite being told to reconsider by the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:54 am
"9th Circuit rules, for third time, that Thai teen's confession in slayings was invalid; The Supreme Court had asked the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to review its previous decisions in the case of a Thai teenager who confessed to killing nine worshipers at a Buddhist temple near Phoenix in 1991": Carol J. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:52 pm by Jon Sands
Yes, the Arizona state courts had found the warnings valid and the confession voluntary, but the state court was unreasonable in its factual determinations and unreasonable in its application of the law. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:10 pm by Walter Olson
Concepcion: ‘Consumers Win in Allegedly Anti-Consumer Supreme Court Ruling’” [PoL] Will Elizabeth Warren partly undo the outcome? [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:20 pm by AdminLaw Blogger
I recently ran across an Arizona Supreme Court opinion that readers of this blog may find interesting, Gutierrez v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:22 am by SHG
When the Supreme Court decided in Padilla v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:50 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Supreme Court Justices Seem Skeptical of Vermont Law Restricting Use of Prescriber-Identifiable Data - Washington, DC lawyer Anna Kraus of Covington & Burling on the firm's blog, Inside Privacy Public Access Issues Under The Shoreline Management Act - Seattle attorney John Lenker of Mikkelborg Broz Wells Fryer on the firm's blog, Seattle Maritime Law Federal Circuit Provides New Rules for Post Injunction Contempt Proceedings in TiVo v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:53 am by Jon Sands
Under AEDPA's deferential standards, the 9th holds that the Arizona Supreme Court's opinion affirming his conviction and sentence was not an unreasonable application of federal law nor an unreasonable determination of the facts.U.S. v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm by cdw
Both are remands from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]