Search for: "D&S, Inc." Results 6681 - 6700 of 26,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2018, 9:04 am
John’s, LLC , 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1748 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Strategic Partners Inc., 102 USPQ2d at 1399 (no likelihood of confusion found with the registered mark ANYWEAR BY JOSIE NATORI and design where the applicant’s previously registered mark ANYWEARS was substantially similar to the applied-for mark ANYWEAR for identical goods)). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:58 am
In re FabFitFun, Inc., Serial No. 86847381 (August 23, 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
Techsplosion, Inc., 261 F.3d 1188, 1193 (11th Cir. 2001) (quoting Tally-Ho, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 11:10 am by Edward Eisert
” Finding that this is not the case and “any current surveillance-sharing agreements are with bitcoin-related markets that are either not significant, not regulated or both – the Commission conclude[d] that the proposal is inconsistent with Exchange Act Section 6(b)(5). [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 9:07 am by Aaron Lancaster
., Ceridian HMC Inc. and Hegewisch Development Corp. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
Zheng Cai, d/b/a Tai Chi Green Tea, Inc. v.Diamong Hong, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1688 (Fed. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm by Wolfgang Demino
As a result, the loan servicing records (Exhibits D through G) come in as admissible for the truth of what is shown on them. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 8:14 am by Elizabeth Kruska
Bushman and The Standard Fire Insurance Company D/B/A Travelers, Inc.2018 VT 93By Elizabeth KruskaCivil litigation is not something I do as a part of my practice. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
On a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff's factual allegations must be accepted as true and all reasonable inferences must be drawn in the plaintiff's favor. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 12:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada described this in Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 2:23 pm
La procédure devant l’ITC puis devant le Circuit fédéral implique analyse de la question de la violation du droit fédéral des brevets d’invention pour décider/juger si une violation de la section 337 s’est ou non produite. [read post]