Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS" Results 6681 - 6700 of 7,546
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2009, 11:52 am by Moderator
Jumet admitted that he had falsely claimed that this "dividend" check was a donation for the high-ranking official’s re-election campaign. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
It requires all board directors to face re-election annually. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm
"They're human subjects and they're not willingly part of this. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 9:57 am
Let the people make that decision,” Humphreys said. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:08 pm by Gordon Firemark
California Supreme Court overturns a 33 year old privacy law decision, allows media to publicize facts from "stale" court files. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 11:18 pm
Despite the efforts to keep the public in the dark, there has been a steady stream of leaks. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:45 pm by Adrian Lurssen
For your reference, we've put together a reading list of legal documents to do with the case, including the official transcript of today's arguments:Filings & Court Docs: Bilski Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court - official transcript...Decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - in Re Bernard L. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm
Elected officials have the weight of the community on them. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 8:55 am
The vote drew dissents from commissioners Anne Northup (statement) and Nancy Nord (official comments, PDF; further statement at her blog). [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:46 pm
Gretchan Crehan Issues: Does the First Amendment prohibit public high school officials from censoring student-initiated, student-composed religious speech at a high school graduation ceremony? [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 6:30 pm by dmk
Our focus is how to think about Windows and how to go about making your own decision. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
: In re Giacomini (Patently-O) District Court Delaware imposes limit of ten disputed terms for claim construction in future cases: Grape Tech. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
: In re Giacomini (Patently-O) District Court Delaware imposes limit of ten disputed terms for claim construction in future cases: Grape Tech. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
: In re Giacomini (Patently-O) District Court Delaware imposes limit of ten disputed terms for claim construction in future cases: Grape Tech. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 10:59 am
"Clearly, we're not there yet," said Seth Wheeler, one of the Treasury officials who oversees the modification effort. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:26 pm by thelawprofessor
This is certainly not what is expected from the marketing department of a public company. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
JIDS will address procedural issues that arise in international dispute resolution procedures, such as provisional measures; the consensual character of jurisdiction; evidence; amicus curiae interventions; res judicata, lis pendens and double fora; the procedural influence of human rights; experts and witnesses; interpretation, revision and challenge of awards and decisions; recognition and enforcement, etc. [read post]