Search for: "Mark" Results 6681 - 6700 of 151,817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2013, 3:43 am by Heidi Henson
Users of E-Verify have given the federal government’s free, Internet-based employment eligibility verification system high marks in a recent customer survey, according to USCIS director Alejandro Mayorkas. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:04 am
"[T]he mark must be a substantially an exact representation of the mark as used on or in connection with the goods. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It is completely consistent with §43(c) that dilution protection could be available for a registrable but unregistered mark but not for an unregistrable mark. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
Aquasol Corp. first explained that when two companies seek to protect the same mark priority is determined by the first to appropriate and use the mark in commerce so long as there is an intention to make continued use of the mark. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
" As to the cited mark, applicant contended, "it can only be assumed that the ... mark was used to attract those seeking Buddhism based yoga and QiGong classes. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:10 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark COLORGANICS for various hair care products, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered marks KOLORGANICS and KOLORGANIQUE for various make-up products. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 9:48 pm by Afro Leo
 The conditions to be endorsed against the registration of the mark are that: "The registration of this mark shall give no right to the exclusive use of the word “clear” and “view “separately and apart from the mark; and  The trademark registrant admits that the registration of this mark shall not debar others from the bona fide descriptive use in the course of trade of the words “clear view” and… [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 5:55 am
" Although applicant's mark begins with MISEL, and the first word in a mark is the portion that consumers notice first [DUH! [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:38 am
" Comparing the marks, the Board noted that there is no per se rule that when an applicant incorporates the whole of the cited mark, the marks must be found to be similar. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 2:17 am
The Marks: Not surprisingly, the Board found the marks to be similar in sound, appearance, and meaning, and very similar in overall commercial impression. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 3:31 pm
 In the UK, non-use of a trade mark for an uninterrupted 5 years, without any proper reason, allows anyone to apply to have the trade mark revoked. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown immediately below, for "restaurant services" in view of the registered mark HOLY COW! [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:56 am
Moreover, when the goods are identical, a lesser degree of similarity between the marks is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion.Because both marks include the the designation BARTON, the marks are similar in appearance and pronunciation. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 2:39 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark SAVORY ROASTERS for "pet food; pet treats" [SAVORY disclaimed], deeming the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark HEARTY ROASTERS for "pet food. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 11:09 am by Amanda Sloat
Yet this date only marks the end of the first phase, the divorce. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:46 pm
The trademarks you describe are certification marks, a special type of mark that informs consumers that the goods meet certain standards or are from a certain region. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 10:20 am by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court ends legal clash over border wall spending; The brief order means the once-potentially epic case will leave little lasting mark in the law”: Todd Ruger of Roll Call has this report. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:14 pm by Howard Bashman
“Trying to pry apart a lawyer’s representational actions from those of his client is like trying to separate Mark Twain from Samuel Clemens. [read post]