Search for: "Peoples v. United States" Results 6681 - 6700 of 19,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
United States, the Supreme Court said, in effect, that automobiles are, themselves, exigencies. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:44 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
The United States has made no representations or promises as to a specific sentence. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
For those who question whether anyone is prosecuted for this offense, see People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:43 am by Bob Farb
This post discusses the first published North Carolina appellate court strip search case since these posts: State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:43 am by Bob Farb
This post discusses the first published North Carolina appellate court strip search case since these posts: State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:42 am by Lawrence Baum
Baum’s primary interest is in courts in the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Marshall instead embraces a “nationalist” vision of the Constitution’s essence in which the people of the United States, rather than the states, ratified the Constitution,  meeting in state conventions solely for convenience. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:30 am
”Oregon is one of only five states that still offers a veteran home loan program. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm by Emily Coward
A California appellate court will address this question in People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
The individual claiming exempt volunteer firefighter status has the burden of demonstrating that he or she enjoys such status [see People v Hayes, 135 AD 19]; and2. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am by Florian Mueller
This sense of responsibility was exemplary, and I hope the United States District Court for the Northern District of California--sort of my other "home court"--will protect judges, court staff, counsel, parties, and a press pool member at a comparably high level when the Epic Games v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:04 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
I do not understand these instruments to require absolute or complete independence. [177] The Constitution enshrines the rights of all people in South Africa. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
United States, SCOTUS Blog (Nov. 14, 2014), http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/yates-v-united-states/. [read post]