Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 6681 - 6700
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
The recent outbreak of measles—a highly contagious childhood disease that had been nearly eradicated in the United States—has focused mostly negative attention on parents who choose not to vaccinate their children. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:59 pm
.), a recent United States Tax Court opinion emanating from California. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:39 am
Hansen In Donahue Schriber Realty Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:41 pm
There have been eight Actos Bladder Cancer trials to date across the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:58 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 3:06 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed the TTAB's ruling in Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
Dade county is more populous than fifteen of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Google http://t.co/nczgG5qYEq -> Rihanna’s Copyright Woes Not Over http://t.co/tv0mWhH6ow -> California man found guilty of running “revenge porn” website http://t.co/H1pVvNsHj5 -> IP Osgoode Speaks Series Video: The Honourable Mr. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Now, county isn't the best unit for this study. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:57 am
The Narayananans family argued the panel could avoid the injustice by applying California state law instead. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 11:20 am
In 1986, the United States Supreme Court opined in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:51 pm
Yesterday, as expected, the US District Court for the Northern District of California certified a class of human egg donors in Kamakahi v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, the California Supreme Court acknowledged that, under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
United States vaccination requirements have been in the news, particularly following what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has described as “a large, ongoing multi-state outbreak linked to an amusement park in California. [read post]
