Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 6681 - 6700
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
In the United States, copyright vests in a work when it is created (17 U.S.C. 302 (a)) and “fixed in any tangible medium” (17 U.S.C. 102 (a)). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
http://bit.ly/LC6ujJ (Mark Ross) Managing Big Data Behind the Firewall: Part 2 - http://bit.ly/PlCXuI (Tom Jenkins) Microsoft Upgrades the Microsoft Outlook Configuration Analyzer Tool – http://bit.ly/PC419b (Casper Manes) Navigating California’s Data Breach Notification Statute - http://bit.ly/LyALjf (Edward Ho, Andres Hurwitz) New Article in ABA Antitrust Magazine Contrasts EU-US Proposals for New Privacy Framewrok… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
The panel consisted of United States District Court Judge J. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:53 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
The most widely reported media story of the week was Rupert Murdoch’s resignations from all his United Kingdom directorships. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:45 pm
Georgiacarry.org, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 11:47 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
While the Supreme Court held that a state could not put a retarded person to death in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm
The government shouldn’t punish individuals for engaging in First Amendment activity, Trout argued, but the Identities Act does just that, by allowing conviction without a showing of the defense’s intention to harm the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:45 am
v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:05 am
It was the subject of Edwards v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:19 am
California Fish Co., 138 P. 79 (Cal. 1913); Marks v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm
Eisentrager and United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 am
” And in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:59 am
United States and Miss United States of America : The potential loss of good will and customers by plaintiff, and possible damage to its reputation, as a result of defendants’ alleged infringement of plaintiff’s marks is not easily quantifiable or remediable by damages, and supports a finding of irreparable harm. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:43 am
Hov IP II, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm
United States and Miss United States of America : The potential loss of good will and customers by plaintiff, and possible damage to its reputation, as a result of defendants’ alleged infringement of plaintiff’s marks is not easily quantifiable or remediable by damages, and supports a finding of irreparable harm. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
