Search for: "United States v. New York" Results 6681 - 6700 of 16,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 12:42 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
A good example of this was a recent decision by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:47 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
A good example of this was a recent decision by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States at the Chautauqua Institution. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
H/T to Alison Frankel for the pointer to the oral arguments in Linde v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:52 am by Nabiha Syed
Courthouse News Service also provides background on United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Donald Thompson
 If you hear that an eye-witness is about to testify at trial and there has been no § 710.30 notice, but there was an identification procedure, move to preclude the testimony on § 710.30 grounds, as a violation of your client’s right to due process as protected by the New York State and United States constitutions, and on relevance grounds, because if the observation didn’t relate to your client, the testimony is not relevant. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
New York, “it seems likely the 2020 census will contain a question about citizenship. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
Here's a case you won't read about every day.On or about January 18, 2006, the New York County Family Court granted a Law Guardian's motion for an order directing the Commissioner of Social Services for the City of New York (CSS) to pay for sex reassignment surgery for a 20-year-old male -- Brian L., also known as "Mariah L. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
  But, instead of suing in New York, AudioEye sued in W.D. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by James Bickford
”   Elsewhere in the Post, Barnes also has coverage of the government’s recent cert. petition in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
A New York court did not abuse its discretion when it reduced a wife's maintenance award by $300 per month because the wife, who had taken a second job, earned more money. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
A New York court did not abuse its discretion when it reduced a wife's maintenance award by $300 per month because the wife, who had taken a second job, earned more money. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 3:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
One of the Tyrannosaurus Bataar skulls seized by ICE.After news broke of the forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]