Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 29,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2022, 8:16 am
[Redacted], "[f]ive years after they broke up, Plaintiff claims she 'learned' that she was raped by [the defendant] during their consensual relationship. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:08 am
Krupa, 633 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:47 am
The defendant alleged a violation of his rights in The Netherlands by actions of the DEA. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:47 pm
Aguilar-Tamayo, 300 F.3d at 566. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 8:08 am
McCuin, 714 F.2d at 1258. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:35 am
Rome, 809 F.2d 665 (10th Cir. 1987). [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 9:45 am
Defendant was suspended from his job for thirty days and then resigned. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
., 74 F.4th 1360 (Fed. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Newman, 959 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 2020): In a software case using the abstraction, filtration, comparison approach, the burden of proof on the protectability of what was copied is on the defendant in the filtration analysis, not on the plaintiff. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:07 pm
Brown, 416 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2005), the Ninth Circuit had held that the secret deal between one of Silva's codefendants was material exculpatory evidence that should have been provided to the defense under Brady v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
" Further, Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure rule 4.2 (F) requires the bank to "serve the disclosure under oath within 30 days after the service of the trustee summons" but also adds "unless the (lower) court otherwise directs. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
Federal Insurance Co., 252 F.3d 608 (2d Cir. 2001), New York law distinguishes between the duty to indemnify and the duty to defend, applying “very different presumptions” to each. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 8:06 am
Buck Green, 523 F.2d [1290,] 1298 [8th Cir. 1975]. [read post]
2 May 2024, 10:39 am
Muslims for Palestine, 9 F.4th 545 (7th Cir. 2021). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:52 am
See Spiegla, 481 F.3dat 964 (7th Cir. 2007) (holding that defendants had notwaived challenge to holding in first appeal where issuenot raised on remand in district court or initial briefingbecause intervening decision was issued after appellatebriefing); Mendenhall, 26 F.3d at 1583 (law of the case didnot apply where new decision issued while case on appeal);Morris v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Fla. 2011), involves an attempt to serve process on a Canadian defendant. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 1:11 pm
A defendant is sentenced to 10–21 months for a Class H felony. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
(d) All costs associated with the video conference or similar technologies being used will be borne by the CBC defendants. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 9:37 am
Sexton, 578 F. [read post]
