Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2009, 1:24 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 12:08 pm
In Douglas v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 6:03 pm
Over the weekend I posted analysis of the Supreme Court's latest ADEA decision, Gross v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(Spicy IP) Israel English version of Israel patent database available (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office gears up for filing online (The IP Factor) Adjudicator of IP rules AMERICAN APPAREL lacks distinguishing features (The IP Factor) ‘Ein Gedi’ not acceptable as a word mark (The IP Factor) Japan Japan starts new patent prosecution highways with Austrian Patent Office and IP Office of Singapore (Managing Intellectual Property) Libya Libya cuts trade mark filing… [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 6:50 am
If the Times had been prevented from publishing the story, this would, in my view, have been a significant setback for investigative journalism under English law. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
The Massachusetts statute authorizing the use of state forensic examiners specifically states that all reports produced by these individuals are sworn statements to be created “for the enforcement of law. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
Flores (08-289 and 08-294), on whether the courts below improperly declined to modify an injunction against Arizona for failing to provide sufficient funding for non-English speaking school children. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:06 am
It arises under SIPA which is contained in Title 15 of the United States Code. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 1:48 pm
Whether their intentions are good or bad, it probably won't take long before the U.S. sees its own case of blog v. state. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:13 am
” CFIT v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
As the English Court of Appeal noted in its 2008 judgment in Research in Motion UK Ltd v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 1:23 pm
Finally, and consistently with the decision in Case C-269/95, Benincasa v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
And after Brown v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
For example, in the United Kingdom, widespread (adverse) publicity in the legal profession followed the English High Court's decision in J P Morgan v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 3:01 am
(photo credit)The second legal development is the trial and proceedings in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
The 1995 case of United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:52 pm
(Nelson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:15 pm
The recent district court decision in Minnesota, Tri-Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:15 pm
The recent district court decision in Minnesota, Tri-Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:31 am
In Hrvatska Elektroprivreda v Slovenia [ICSID Case No ARB/05/24 (6 May 2008)] the defendant, in an arbitration before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investments Disputes (ICSID) waited until one week before a substantive hearing, to disclose to the tribunal and the claimant, a list of lawyers who would be attending. [read post]
