Search for: "Google, Inc" Results 6701 - 6720 of 11,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 1:10 pm by Mary Minow
Panelists included Ian Ballon, Shareholder at Greenberg Traurig, Lothar Determann, Partner at Baker & McKenzie, Tristan Ostrowski, Product Counsel, Android at Google Inc., Geoff Griffith, Senior Counsel at Google Inc, Thomas “TJ” Angioletti, Associate General Counsel, Technology & Transactions at Netflix, Daniel Brennan, Director, Legal at Twitter, Inc. and Luis Villa, Deputy General Counsel at Wikimedia Foundation. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:25 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Indeed, the defendants Blagman has sued are Apple Inc.; Amazon.com, Inc.; Google Inc.; Microsoft Corporation; EMusic.com Inc. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:04 pm
Vonage’s recent deal with VoIP Inc. could help convince the judge to give Vonage more time. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Google Inc., 708 F.3d 1310, 1321–22 (Fed. [read post]
30 May 2010, 1:02 pm by Scott Koller
Scott Koller at California Insurance Blog Blog this on Blogger Share this on Facebook Post on Google Buzz Add this to Google Reader Share this on LinkedIn Tweet This! [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm by SOIssues
The Globe paraphrased Kerry as saying he had won initial support from Web giants Microsoft Corp. and Google Inc. and had consulted with Facebook Inc. and consumer and privacy advocates. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  According to the complaint, Beiersdorf, Inc. marketed the skin cream in nationwide television ads and through sponsored search results on Google. [read post]
6 May 2007, 9:00 pm
DMCA Safe Harbor Provisions: Wolfgang's Vault wants recordings off blogs; From: Wolfgang â [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:14 am
* Ken Adams blogs on Affinity Internet, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 10:57 pm
Certainly Google is trumpeting the case as a win. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
It is now over ten years since the landmark decision in Campbell v MGN Ltd ([2004] 2 AC 457) established the misuse of private information (“MOPI”) tort (any lingering doubt that it might not be a tort has been eradicated by the Court of Appeal decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311). [read post]