Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 6701 - 6720 of 36,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2016, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
This was recognised in Cooke & Midland Heart Limited v MGN Limited & Trinity Mirror Midlands Limited [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB), the first case that considered section 1(1) in any detail. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
These lawsuits, typically filed under the ’33 Act and alleging misrepresentations in the offering documents, claim that investors who purchased securities in the offering have been harmed due to the deterioration in the performance of the underlying mortgages. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:14 am
  So finding, the court permitted Owners’ tort claims.Developer next argued that the economic loss doctrine barred any tort claims, such that its alleged negligence causing purely economic harms ought not create tort liability in the absence of privity, actual physical injury, or risk thereof. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 11:33 am
States’ decisions considered harmful or discriminatory for investments (thus also for IPRs) including anything from exceptions to patent rights, compulsory licenses and decisions not to grant patent rights could expose a party of the TPP to lengthy and costly arbitration proceedings. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 5:39 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Some states apply a “direct harm” test that examines whether the harm flows to the company first or to the shareholder first. [read post]