Search for: "MATTER OF T L S" Results 6701 - 6720 of 9,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2023, 6:17 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I quote from my book Corporate Law (Concepts and Insights):  No matter how closely one scrutinizes Securities Exchange Act § 14(a), one will not find anything relating to a private party cause of action under the statute or rules. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
" … "[L]awsuits are public events and the public has a legitimate interest in knowing the facts involved in them. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:29 am by HR Daily Advisor Staff
It’s equally important to comprehend how your company generates revenue, understanding the P&L, and knowing your customers, including their challenges. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:50 am by Seán Binder
So, free speech doesn’t give [Trump] the right to engage in a fraudulent conspiracy,” Barr added. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
I am not saying that policy doesn't matter--that's what really affects people's lives, but policy is where reasonable minds can disagree I believe, and so I tend to be more open-minded about whether or not someone who generally agrees with me favors or disfavors some policy. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm by Howard Wasserman
Local Union 542, Int'l Union of Operating Engineers. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by Hiscox
Born into Business Among the 20 billionaires on the list, 13 inherited a family business—including Bernard Arnault of LVMH, Walmart heiress Alice Walton, and L’Oréal’s Françoise Bettencourt Meyers. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by Hiscox
Born into Business Among the 20 billionaires on the list, 13 inherited a family business—including Bernard Arnault of LVMH, Walmart heiress Alice Walton, and L’Oréal’s Françoise Bettencourt Meyers. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:55 am
These two facets consist of two intrinsically intercon-nected and vital components: law’s verbal and non-verbal sign systems. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:25 pm by Andrea Shannon (US)
What matters, the government argues, is that the Lanham Act’s disparagement clause does not take away any common law rights the trademark owner may have. [read post]