Search for: "State of Connecticut"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 17,604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm
UPS – Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Shipman & Goodwin in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Employee Apps = Employer Data Risk? [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:22 pm
In 2011, he promised a Connecticut real estate company that he would secure a $20 million loan in return for a $200,000 upfront fee and other payments. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:50 am
The case did, however, generate a massive political backlash and resulted in the enactment of eminent domain reform laws in numerous states and the rekindling of a national debate over property rights and takings. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:47 am
The Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Court's grant of a new trial to a defendant convicted of "one of the most brutal crimes" in state history for Brady and ineffective assistance violations The petitioner was forty-two years old when... [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 5:48 am
Well, as I’ve talked about earlier this month, Connecticut employers have to worry first about the state anti-discrimination laws which are broader than the federal ones. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:09 pm
. $149,000 Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tenn., $500,000 University of Maine, Orono, Maine, $900,000 University of California, Davis, Calif., $751,000 Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich., $700,000 Effective Mitigation Strategies for Antimicrobial Resistance Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo., $749,838 University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla., $2,193,556 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn., $2,250,000 Wake Forest University,… [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
Connecticut response. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:21 am
Finally, the employee’s emotional distress claim could not withstand the employer’s motion to dismiss, as his complaint did not “remotely” allege the kind of “aggravating” facts needed to state a viable claim. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:46 am
Lobbying “Lobbyists-Turned-Staffers Disclose Salaries, Clients” by Kate Ackley for Roll Call Massachusetts: “State Data: Top 7 Massachusetts lobbying firms earned over $3 million each during 2013-2014 session” by Andy Metzger (State House News Service) for MassLive.com Utah: “Mormon Church Lobbying in Utah’s Capitol – Hardball or Light Touch? [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:22 pm
• Data intensive industries are located in many states, but the highest concentrations are in Washington, D.C.; Virginia; Massachusetts; Maryland; and Connecticut. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 3:57 am
You are visiting New York City , Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn, Long Island, the Hudson Valley or a neighboring state such as New Jersey, Connecticut or Pennsylvania. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:16 am
Defendants denied the majority of plaintiff’s original allegations, and provided some affirmative defenses, of most relevance: Defendants affirmatively stated that Pasternak Wine Imports was the name of a general partnership (now inactive) organized under the laws of Connecticut. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 2:28 pm
Although federal law applies uniformly to all states, individual states may regulate ABLE accounts differently. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:27 am
Feliciano apparently disagreed, because she filed suit in state court. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:21 pm
Paul Fire & Marine State Farm TIG Insurance Transamerica The Travelers U.S.A.A. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:40 am
The Department of Social Services in Connecticut opposes the increase because it will shift millions in costs to the already-stretched state Medicaid program. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:45 pm
The number of ill persons identified in each state was as follows: Connecticut (1), Iowa (1), New Mexico (1), Tennessee (1), and Texas (2). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 11:25 am
Daly, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, announced the indictment. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
” The editorial is actually wrong to state that Connecticut did not adopt a reform law. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
Echo Hose Ambulance ("In this appeal, we are presented with an issue not previously addressed by either this court or our Supreme Court: whether, in defining the term ‘employee’ for purposes of the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (CFEPA), General Statutes § 46a-51 et seq., Connecticut should adopt the remuneration test applied by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit when defining that term in Title VII cases. [read post]
