Search for: "State v. Michael A." Results 6701 - 6720 of 13,677
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by INFORRM
I assume Michael filed his motion under §27.003(a) of the TCPA, which states that “[i]f a legal action is based on, relates to, or is in response to a party’s exercise of the right of free speech, right to petition, or right of association, that party may file a motion to dismiss the legal action. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:04 am by Jeff Neuburger
  This limitation of “present capacity” was echoed by a California state court in Stockwell v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
The trial court, alas, erred in stating the relevant statistical concepts. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:38 pm by Andrew M. Ironside
The title of this post comes from this upcoming paper by Professor Michael Morley, the abstract of which states: The four-factor test for issuing injunctions under federal laws that the Supreme Court endorsed in eBay, Inc. v MercExchange, L.L.C. requires... [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:50 am by Andrew Delaney
Supreme Court set up a procedure in Anders v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:47 am by Amy Howe
Michael Dorf weighs in on the Court’s opinion in Bond v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
  I assume Michael filed his motion under §27.003(a) of the TCPA, which states that “[i]f a legal action is based on, relates to, or is in response to a party's exercise of the right of free speech, right to petition, or right of association, that party may file a motion to dismiss the legal action. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:13 am by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
State Street, Suite 517      Redlands, CA 92373 T: (909) 708-6055 E: michael@michaelreiterlaw.com W: http://michaelreiterlaw.com [read post]