Search for: "State v. Weeks"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 42,066
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
In the past few weeks, the Supreme Court has been cleaning up some of the untidiness left after the November 2020 presidential election. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
The California Court of Appeal (Fourth District, Division Two) issued this unpublished opinion last week, reducing a punitive damages award from $750,000 to $150,000 in a case involving $15,000 in compensatory damages. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:51 am
In last week’s case (Hussain v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:56 am
During the last week of March 2012, Respondent and the children moved out of the Via Minucia apartment and into the new residence. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 11:18 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:57 pm
A magistrate in Riverside, CA has canceled a hearing that was scheduled for Tuesday afternoon in the Apple v FBI case, at the FBI’s request late Monday. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm
This week, the US Supreme Court handed down a decision in Turner v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
As I noted last week and major news outlets have also reported, the United States Supreme Court is poised next week to consider taking up the North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering case involving the so-called Independent-State- Legislature (ISL) theory. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
Lyon visited for about a week in October. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
Lyon visited for about a week in October. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:41 pm
by Deepak Gupta We're previously mentioned AT&T v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am
United States and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:45 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:36 pm
In the recent decision, Gent v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 7:19 am
In Felder v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:45 am
The country in which you want to live, I'm sure, but which (1) has deported you, (2) doesn't want you, and (3) knows about your prior conviction.Two weeks ago, your ex-wife got arrested for smuggling illegal aliens to the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:21 am
Holdings v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
