Search for: "Ability Insurance Company" Results 6721 - 6740 of 10,310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The idea was to protect insurers (that’s the insurance companies) from potentially high-risk insureds (those who had been unable to obtain insurance before because of their health or age) who might disproportionately take advantage of the federal health care exchanges early on in the process. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:17 am by Adam Weinstein
Sunset has its principal offices in Kansas City, Missouri and is wholly-owned by Kansas City Life Insurance Company, Inc., an insurance company. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:47 am by Steven Gursten
  It comes at a time when many insurance company adjusters are wrongly  and misleadingly arguing that car accident victims will not recover pain and suffering compensation for a “serious impairment of body function,” unless the injuries are permanent. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:45 pm
Unsurprisingly, insurance companies often suspect claimants of being malingerers or trying to “game the system. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:04 pm
”  Enhanced customer service promises “our Business Law Research Experts monitor the progress of your service ticket to insure timely resolution. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:04 am by Jon Gelman
The big deal is that the safety violation penalty is not paid by the insurance company--it is paid directly from the employer's pocket (which also makes for increased litigation of these claims!). [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 11:02 pm
Because of my gratitude toward them, I pay one million per year out of my own pocket, so every employee from dishwasher up has 100% company-paid health insurance coverage. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:50 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The service provider, its team, processes and procedures should have a history and currently be financially and operationally sound with significant experience and ability in the area. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:50 pm by Bryant Walker Smith, guest-blogging
It could also be complemented by public requirements for insurance, bonding, and takeback. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:00 am by Bryant Walker Smith
It could also be complemented by public requirements for insurance, bonding, and takeback. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
appeared first on Reduce Your Workers Compensation Insurance Coverage Costs with Timely Information for Employers | Work Comp Roundup. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 9:56 am by John Pfaff
And the PPACA has made it illegal for insurance companies to deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions, and prior to the PPACA insurance companies often imposed lifetime (!) [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:32 am
The difference between that and what it actually costs is paid directly to the insurance company by the federal government. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:57 am by David DePaolo
Not only is there nothing to lose by doing so, but the applicant attorney faces an irate client if he fails to do so, and in fact may face claims and/or liability of malpractice for failing to do so.My guess is that most applicant attorneys have a process already in place for staff to immediately and automatically request an IMR of any and every UR decision that is adverse (or perhaps not even adverse) to their client if, for nothing else, to protect against a claim of malpractice.And I would not… [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:57 am by David DePaolo
Not only is there nothing to lose by doing so, but the applicant attorney faces an irate client if he fails to do so, and in fact may face claims and/or liability of malpractice for failing to do so.My guess is that most applicant attorneys have a process already in place for staff to immediately and automatically request an IMR of any and every UR decision that is adverse (or perhaps not even adverse) to their client if, for nothing else, to protect against a claim of malpractice.And I would not… [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 2:27 pm by Michael
After the April Act: There is now tougher regulation and a ban on the ability for solicitors and claims management companies to handle any referral fees. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:04 am by Kit Case
The big deal is that the safety violation penalty is not paid by the insurance company–it is paid directly from the employer’s pocket (which also makes for increased litigation of these claims!). [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:04 am by Kit Case
The big deal is that the safety violation penalty is not paid by the insurance company–it is paid directly from the employer’s pocket (which also makes for increased litigation of these claims!). [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The letter “did not give [the insurer] notice that the Bank considered the Pariser loss covered by a policy of (the insurer’s] insurance. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 2:39 pm by Jon Gelman
This is an evaluation performed by a doctor who is usually hired by a defendant insurance company to offer a second opinion. [read post]