Search for: "Gooding v. United States" Results 6721 - 6740 of 21,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2013, 8:40 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Reconsidering how federal courts choose applicable nonfederal laws would also provide an opportunity to reconcile Klaxon’s irrebuttable preference for intrastate uniformity with the more flexible default rule in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
It was mentioned by the speaker primarily as an example of how trade marks can affect the free movement of goods/services within the Community. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:49 pm by Josh Fensterbush
Australia’s legal regime is similar to the United States in that there is a federal government and separate state/territory governments with their own autonomy. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
In one of the two oppositions the involved marks were identical (BACCARAT), and in the other the goods were overlapping (clothing).Baccarat S.A. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:26 pm by Brian A. Comer
Mark Lift Indus., Inc., 366 S.C. 308, 622 S.E.3d 213 (2005) addressed this issue in a certified question from the United States District Court. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm by LTA-Editor
His recent attempt to register “Eat More Kale” with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), however, irked Georgia-based Chick-fil-A, which sent him a cease-and-desist letter claiming the marks are confusingly similar, according to press accounts. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:01 pm by Steven Boutwell
While AFL and Alphamate were arbitrating this contractual dispute in Europe, Alphamate also initiated maritime attachment proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:15 am
  The two Congressmen offered their good offices to consider the issue. [read post]
12 May 2021, 3:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Harrison filed an action against Montgomery County under the Takings Clause of the Fifth (and Fourteenth) Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 2:43 pm
They contend that conclusory allegations cannot simply be ignored, as suggested by petitioners and the United States, because the distinction between factual allegations and conclusions of the pleader was previously rejected by the Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
United States (No. 10-3623), the circuits are also split. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm by Michael O'Hear
United States (No. 10-3623), the circuits are also split. [read post]