Search for: "MATTER OF BROWN"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 9,189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2011, 1:37 pm
Aware that he was writing for a potential appellate record, and for that matter for the court of public opinion – the Institute For Justice having made this a cause celebre – the judge then delivered a comprehensive summation. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:52 pm
Destroying property is generally a seizure of that property, Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:49 pm
Whether that impacts Governor Brown’s appointment, or Professor Cuellar’s willingness to serve, remains to be seen. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:32 am
Another aspect of the opinion in Brown is more troubling. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm
The Supreme Court has announced that the judgments of In the matter of an application by Brigid McCaughey and another for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 2 – 3 February 2011, and R (on the application of GC) (FC) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent) and R (on the application of C) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 31 January – 1 February 2011, will be handed down on Wednesday 18 May 2011. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
” Eady J then explained that: “It is not a black and white distinction between public and private in such circumstances, but rather a matter of looking at the particular facts and deciding whether, notwithstanding some publication, there remains a reasonable expectation of some privacy. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm
McBride was initially successful in his suit but the newspaper convinced the Constitutional Court that the case involved matters of constitutional signficance – the impact of amnesty on freedom of expression – and they appealed the findings of the court below. [read post]
15 May 2011, 4:16 pm
It is not the conviction alone that matters. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:59 am
Yet they are embedded within the fabric and location of a community, and given the myriad ways they are interwoven with government – Medicare, Medicaid, state reimbursements, licensing – they may as a practical matter have to accommodate the city’s desires for revenues. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am
In Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2008] QB 103 at para 61), the Court considered the impact of “information which is made available to a person’s circle of friends or work colleagues and information which is widely published in a newspaper”. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:50 am
This is the highest and best use of the blawgosphere, to engage in thoughtful conversation with one's peers about things that matter, at least to the writer. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:47 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion and Order in the following matter: OP 11-0206, 2011 MT 97N, THE OFFICE OF THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, Petitioner, v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:38 am
Brown outs and black outs are to be the allocation method of last resort. [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:00 am
App. 2008) (affirming trial court finding that defendant governmental entity was immune from suit for common law nuisance under Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act (GTLA) and finding no liability under GTLA for dangerous condition finding no notice); Brown v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:56 pm
Amber Melville-Brown is a media law specialist counsel at London based law firm Withers [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:25 am
There are many reasons why immigration enforcement is a matter of federal, and not state, authority. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:39 pm
Some Senators have written to the IRS on this matter. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
5/9/2011 Guest: Michael Froomkin Free Expression International More Issues in Free Expression Photo by sheriffmitchell This post is part of "CDT Fellows Focus," a series that presents the views of notable experts on tech policy issues. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
There are two appeals in the Privy Council this week to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
