Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 8,633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2010, 4:05 pm
Peter Martin’s Intro to Legal Citation), is a required skill for any legal researcher. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
. : Columbia University Press, c2010.Constitutional LawKF228.G528 J64 2010Gibbons v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
In Zuid-Chemie v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:13 am
Title VII does not bar the selection of an individual because of the individual’s personal relationship with the appointing authorityFella v County of Rockland, 297 A.D.2d 813According to the court's decision, the Rockland County Director of Employee Rights and Equity Compliance concluded that Rockland County Commissioner of Hospitals Peter T. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 1:44 pm
Div. 2d Dep't in People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 11:37 am
Professional Responsibility Revocation Where attorney Peter T. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:52 am
"Airlines ditch first class seats in favour of more economy" http://j.mp/aEg2zH The Peter Black Daily is out! [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 1:21 am
Highlights this week included: US Supreme Court to hear Bayh-Dole patent ownership dispute: Stanford v Roche (Patently-O) (IPKat) (IPBiz) US DoJ amicus brief in Myriad says no to patentability of genomic DNA: AMP v USPTO (IPBiz) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Patent Docs) (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) Gemzar (Gemcitabine) – US: CAFC denies en banc rehearing of ‘distorted’ law of double-patenting: Sun Pharmaceuticals v Eli Lilly (Peter… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
Peter Padilla: NO! [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:26 am
We remember last year's Supreme Court term, which gave us Skilling v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:22 am
The decision in Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:16 am
Repetti & Co., Peter J. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:33 am
Part V: Cultural Property. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:55 pm
Otago University law professor Peter Skegg said that, "it is usually good practice to consult with others before entering a do-not-resuscitate order on the patient's chart. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 4:15 am
Whether a retiree may file a grievance alleging a “violation of the collective bargaining agreement” is for the arbitrator to decideMatter of Peters v Union-Endicott Cent. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
In Minkoff v. [read post]
