Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 21,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
Aug. 2, 2002) (holding that an accident report created by the state patrol is not a motor vehicle record under the DPPA); O’Brien v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:28 pm
In Casey et al. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am
After NPCC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
In a lengthy dissenting judgment, Lord Justice Sales disagreed with the application of the defence stating that the difference between his view and that of the majority was that he considered greater weight should be given to the rights of the trade mark owner and the protection of the interests of the relevant public. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:49 pm
Koral since it was only temporarily in the other locations and hence never acquired the situs of another state (and hence was never taxed). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:24 am
United States consumers were harmed economically, in that the higher prices charged were part of $300 million in retail sales from the five publishers, including $40 million for e-books licensed through Apple’s iBookstore. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
Never too late 24 [week ending Sunday 14 December] -- ** INTA’s When Trademarks Overlap With Other IP Rights Special ** | Scottish Law Society misinforms about UPC in Scotland | EPO Enlarged BoA Members’ letter against against President Battistelli’s BoA Member’s house ban | German lititgator writes German delegate to EPO AC | EU Judges join the chorus of condemnation against President Battistelli | EPO replies to multilarelal concerns | Scam letters from… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
Simply stated, if plaintiff had not pursued the fatally flawed claitns in the Underlying Holdover Proceeding, plaintiff would not have faced any liability whatsoever. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:54 pm
Sys. of The City of Detroit v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:25 am
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:25 am
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:31 am
See Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:30 am
It has not been mentioned on this blog that the French Cour de cassation has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the ECJ regarding Article 5(3) Brussels I Regulation (Concurrence Sàrl v Samsung Electronics France SAS, Amazon Services Europe Sàrl – Case C-618/15) on 23 November 2015. [read post]
28 May 2022, 5:01 am
In 2019, a fire destroyed 7,727 bottles stored in Argentina awaiting shipment to, and sale from, the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
(Wilson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:19 pm
Soto v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 6:00 am
With one strategic maneuver, the plaintiffs in the O'Bannon v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 6:03 am
From Justice Holmes' dissent in Pahnandle Oil Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:42 am
On the one hand, states can expand federal IP rights beyond the scope allowed by federal law – for instance, by sanctioning contract rules that restrict buyers' use of copyrighted materials (held enforceable in ProCD v. [read post]
