Search for: "United States v. House"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 12,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SHORT TITLE section 1. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
Statutes at Large, v. 8, at 444) was terminated by the United States because of Russia’s discriminatory immigration policies. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:17 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Knick v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
By the end of August 2021 DOD had evacuated over 120,000 people, which included not just SIV applicants but others at risk as well, 74,000 of which were housed on DOD installations in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
House of Representatives. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm
ArsT took a look at the data, which shows Turkey took the place of top censor from the United States this time, requesting that 8,751 pieces of content be removed. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
State legislatures have discretion to set tax and spending priorities, the Supreme Court said in 1977 in United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 8:05 am
” In Wooden v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
For example, Title VII only covers employers of a certain size, while the Fair Housing Act has a carve-out for owner-occupied smaller housing units (pp. 70-71). [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
PUTTING THE WAR IN CYBERWAR: METAPHOR, ANALOGY, AND CYBERSECURITY DISCOURSE IN THE UNITED STATES Sean Lawson First Monday, Volume 17, Number 7 – 2 July 2012 [
Footnotes omitted; they are available in the original via the hyperlink above. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm
This morning the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down its long-awaited judgment in Al Skeini & Others v United Kingdom, and its partner case of Al Jedda v United Kingdom, concerning whether the United Kingdom had any liability under the Convention for the alleged deaths and detention of individuals in SE Iraq during its military campaign there. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
Section 12(3) of the Act was interpreted by the House of Lords in Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee ([2004] UKHL 44) to mean that, in order to obtain an interim injunction, the claimant must ordinarily show (at least) that his claim is more likely than not to succeed at trial. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:46 am
United States, concluding that he “still think[s] the government’s surplusage argument is pretty silly, but I’m no longer so sure the government’s reading creates an absurd amount of surplusage. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 9:24 am
The United States Supreme Court had stayed the injunction in Texas Top Cop Shop, but a nationwide injunction remained in place due to a January ruling in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
” Comcast argued that the memoranda fell within the “derivative privilege” recognized in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
United States [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
United States [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 6:19 am
The police later testified that they announced to the suspects that they were “State Police” and ordered them to leave the house, and that the suspects shouted back, “We have guns,” before firing two shotgun blasts. [read post]
