Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm
Taking time to make changes needed to find and resolve potential conflicts and other ambiguities between required terms of the SBC and Glossary and existing health plan documentation, communications and procedures is particularly important in light of the United States Supreme Court’s May 16, 2011 ruling in Cigna Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:03 pm
The Legal Information Institute (LII) at Cornell Law School has posted an article outlining the major decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States for the 2011-2012 term.From the introduction:"The 2011-2012 Supreme Court Term marks the first time in three years that there was not a new justice on the bench. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
Thirdly, the earlier trade mark must have a reputation in the European Union, in the case of an earlier CTM, or in the Member State concerned, in the case of an earlier national trade mark. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:52 pm
On Friday, July 6, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:50 am
Lord Neuberger in the Court of Appeal went as far as to state as follows. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
On the one hand, the First Circuit’s decision in Cusumano v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
Judge Atlas found that the language of the Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provision is silent about its extraterritorial applicability and held that there is a “presumption that the Provision does not govern conduct outside the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
Judge Atlas found that the language of the Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provision is silent about its extraterritorial applicability and held that there is a “presumption that the Provision does not govern conduct outside the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
BALLON - #141819 [email] HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 [email] GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP [email] [address] [phone] [fax] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
” United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:06 pm
The government has filed its opposition brief in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:54 am
He then filed a disability discrimination claim with the United States Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
” Townsend, 147 Wn.2d at 673 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Kadoranian v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:48 am
Plaintiff then went to an alternate class defined as “all individuals who have undergone the EsophyX procedure in the United States since September 24, 2007. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:48 am
Plaintiff then went to an alternate class defined as “all individuals who have undergone the EsophyX procedure in the United States since September 24, 2007. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
By Mark D. [read post]
