Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 13,885
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2021, 8:54 am
" For that holding, the Court cites Duplan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:46 am
On December 16, 2019 the Supreme Court denied cert in Ackies v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:17 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 7:39 am
Law Offices of Phillip J. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:51 am
Checking for intoxication at roadside stops became legal after the 1975 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Insurance/Administrative Law: SABS; Standard of ReviewYatar v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:25 am
”Relying on this Federal Circuit dicta and on an earlier decision from the Court of Federal Claims, Government Technical Services, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:05 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:21 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I just noticed this decision, from a few weeks ago — Burfoot v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:16 pm
Although the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) agreed, the district court rejected that argument. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:59 am
The Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) upheld the Wyoming Workers’ Safety and Compensation Division’s (Division) denial of benefits, and the district court affirmed the OAH decision. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 4:11 am
For over 4 decades the Law Offices of Jon L Gelman 1.973.696.7900 jon@gelmans.com has been representing injured workers and their families who have suffered occupational accidents and illnesses.Related Articles:Workers' Compensation: NJ Supreme Court Hears Argument on ...May 19, 2016 ... [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh… [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:03 pm
FIESELER v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
This week, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s ruling dismissing the suit, holding that Kimmett’s First Amendment rights weren’t violated because his complaints about the waste and abuse didn’t fall within the protection of Pickering v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
V. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:38 pm
Ashcroft and other federal officials, came in the case of Arar v. [read post]
