Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 6741 - 6760 of 12,270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2014, 3:48 pm by Brendan Kevenides
 What I am proposing, to be clear, is not a change in the law; but clearer, better guidance to jurors. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
  I have witnessed them from the beginning of the modern Special Master programs in the 1980’s through the single assignment Special Masters (both mediator and case management/discovery referee) and the dual reference (where the case manager/discovery referee and the mediator are separated) and cases with no outside supervision and the case is handled per the CCP. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:53 am
We reiterated that to determine whether a search occurs when law enforcement uses tracking technology to which a physical trespass on a defendant's property does not apply, we apply the test set forth in Katz v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 11:22 am by Giles Peaker
The Defendant having planning permission for an activity (as here) does not mean that the activity is lawful. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
More here.A federal judge has awarded Black Eyed Peas songwriter will.i.am $1 million in costs and attorney's fees for successfully defending  a claim that the band had infringed copyright in their2009 hit, "I Gotta Feeling. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 10:36 pm by Kate Westmoreland
  Until then, let’s cut through the hyperbole to see what the case does and does not mean. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
This case came to trial against the background of the South Carolina Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
 Assume I've been appointed to represent a criminal defendant on appeal. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
Barclays was in fact one of the many financial institutions named as a defendant in that earlier suit. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
Again, the opinion gives more detail than I can include here. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:30 am by INFORRM
  The case law which has developed through most of the common law world and in Strasbourg since the decision in Reynolds v Times Newspapers has properly focussed on “responsible journalism” or, using the Strasbourg terminology, “the ethics of journalism“. [read post]