Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 6741 - 6760 of 13,856
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2016, 6:49 am by Docket Navigator
Amazon.com, Inc., 1-15-cv-00154 (TXWD February 29, 2016, Order) (Pitman, M.J.) [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:11 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
On February 22, 2015, Defendants fileda motion to dismiss (Motion), claiming that the complaint does not contain sufficient factual matters to put Defendants on fair notice of the claims against them. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  Antioch had 29 total pedestrian accidents which places it 35 of 56 where “1” is the city with the highest number of pedestrian accidents (in other words, “1” had the worst numbers and “56” the best). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:31 am by Joy Waltemath
Conversely, if the arbitration provision is narrow, and does not appear to cover duration, the court determines whether the contract remained in effect. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:26 pm by Robert Chesney
  (p.29) I got a strong sense that this perception was, at bottom, what drove the outcome in this case. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:33 am by Jon Ibanez
If the 4th Amendment doesn’t protect searches of our bodies, what does it protect? [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 5:57 am by Sally-Ann Underhill and James Hatchard
During the voyage, cargo in hold no.1 shifted, causing significant damage to part of the cargo itself. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:37 am by Martin George
But the court may also come to the conclusion that the obligation to pay a ‘blank-cassette levy’ simply does not constitute a ‘matter relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict’, relegating the claimant to proceedings in the defendants’ home jurisdiction(s) pursuant to Art. 2(1) Brussels I (= Art. 4(1) Brussels I recast). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
Furthermore, the court found the requirement for pre-enactment evidence does not preclude governments from “relying on their own wisdom and common sense. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:05 am
While laudable, this entry point clouds an assessment of where the legal system is moving because it neglects the fundamental role of the political power organizing it: the CCP.The legal system does not operate in a vacuum. [read post]