Search for: "John Robert" Results 6741 - 6760 of 20,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2018, 12:26 pm by Mark Walsh
Absent are Virginia Thomas and Jane Roberts, who accompanied her husband, Chief Justice John Roberts, to the state dinner at the White House last night in honor of President of France Emmanuel Macron. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:58 am by Josh Blackman
Avoid the Statutory Claim Altogether Early on in the proceedings, Chief Justice John Roberts floated an argument that would be in keeping with his preference for judicial minimalism. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:34 am by Amy Howe
” It wasn’t clear whether Kagan was convinced, but other justices – most notably Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito – were clearly worried that a ruling for the challengers might entangle courts in second-guessing the president’s national-security determinations. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am by Chimène Keitner
(Part II-A of Kennedy’s opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas, strongly suggests that international law itself must provide for corporate liability, but indicates that “the Court need not resolve” that question.) [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 10:45 am by Brendan Conley
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, published a chart in the body of the opinion showing the gap between black and white voter registration levels in the six states covered by the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:05 am by Ilya Somin
For example, Chief Justice John Roberts asked whether Trump's anti-Muslim statements can also be used to invalidate such actions as launching air strikes against Muslim terrorists. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:33 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
El Juez Presidente del Tribunal Supremo, John Roberts, quien redactó la decisión, sostuvo que los casos consolidados conservan sus identidades separadas, de modo que una decisión final en una acción es apelable de inmediato por la parte perdedora, incluso si otras acciones en el procedimiento consolidado permanecen. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” At ThinkProgress, Ian Millhiser suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts “and his conservative colleagues seemed … eager to endorse” Texas’ argument “that allegations of racism should be treated with great skepticism. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 6:01 pm by Amy Howe
” Keller also fielded a question from Chief Justice John Roberts, who sometimes likes to play devil’s advocate. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
Writing for seven of the justices (all but Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch), Justice Clarence Thomas took a straight and simple route to upholding the statute. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by David Markus
Book, Robert Weisberg from EEOC Miami, Grissel Seijo from Restaurant Brands International, and John Byrne, Esq., partner at Leon Cosgrove, LLP. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by Hayley Evans
Mattis on the government’s proposed transfer of John Doe. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:33 am by Jennifer Chacon
Alito, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch seemed puzzled as to why it matters whether the date of the hearing is provided. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am by Susan Klein
Coberly struggled to answer the question put to him by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Samuel Alito, Stephen Breyer, and finally Elena Kagan: “[W]hat explanation would have sufficed? [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:16 am by Howard Bashman
Kean, John Danforth, and Carter Phillips have this op-ed in today’s edition of The New York Times. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:09 am by Steve Brachmann
Justice Neil Gorsuch penned a dissent to which Chief Justice John Roberts concurred. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 3:31 am by Lyle Denniston
  It is the only case being heard that day, so Chief Justice John G. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm by Mark Walsh
” After Coberly’s argument, Chief Justice John Roberts recognizes “General Rosenstein. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm by Ronald Mann
” As Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized repeatedly during the argument, the clause reflects the concern of the Constitution’s drafters with “accountability” – the idea that some readily identifiable official could be held accountable for the selection of any “officer” of the United States. [read post]