Search for: "MATTER OF T L S" Results 6741 - 6760 of 9,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2011, 2:43 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
[L]awyers who are marketing to people (PI, criminal defense, consumer rights), LinkedIn doesn't hold a lot of promise apart from whatever value it may have as a general-purpose networking tool. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
Unfortunately, the preliminary program doesn't say what room that is in but once I know what it is next week, I'll share it here on the listserve and on Prawfs.com Presenters on these panels are sharing their drafts with the others on their panels, hopefully by today (I say shame-facedly and foot-draggingly). [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Merrill et al., Nat’l Research Coun- cil of the Nat’l Academies, A Patent System for the 21st Century 122 (2004). [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
In 1997, Lawrence Pope, Abbott's patent attorney, and Dr. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:14 pm by Christa Culver
 It’s an outrage that his name isn’t better known in the First Amendment world. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:05 am by Deborah Pearlstein
HRF (in my view correctly) describes the current conflict in Afghanistan as a NIAC, but then moves directly (past Common Article 3's "regularly constituted courts," APII, etc.) to int'l human rights law (ICCPR) for the relevant procedural standards. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:20 am by Jeff Marshall
The federal government pays no matter how much the state program costs. [read post]
22 May 2011, 1:25 pm
- L May 7 From MM to Linkee No thank you - I don't use LinkedIn. [read post]
22 May 2011, 8:32 am
A Website to Try to Get a Mortgage Modification under the Obama Plan I don't do mortgage modifications right now, but there's a nifty Nolo's Bankruptcy and Foreclosure Blog that points to a government website... [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:51 am by admin
Similarly, Baro (mentioned above) also said that the applicants don’t have to, and are not expected to anticipate the kinds of information that immigration officials might be interested in receiving, stating, “there is no onus on the person to disclose all information that might possibly be relevant”, but the decision maker must look at the surrounding circumstances to decide whether the applicant has failed to comply with s. 40(l)(a). [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
The two cases cover the same subject matter. [read post]