Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 6741 - 6760
of 41,773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
” Brief for the United States, U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:51 pm
In Sink v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 8:55 pm
Recently, a helpful reader directed us to a new Kansas Appellate decision assuaging Scalia's fears by upholding a state law criminalizing bestiality in State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
Alan B. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:48 pm
That's the question the United States Supreme Court considered on Monday in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
On November 10, 2009, Senior United States District Judge Jack B. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 12:00 am
" 29 USCA § 2102(b)(3); Allen v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:47 pm
Quoting Amchem Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:23 am
Nash v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Lane v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:15 am
In the case, Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
US, No. 06-11612 Express consent by counsel suffices to permit a magistrate judge to preside over jury selection in a felony trial, pursuant to the authorization in the Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(3). [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 2:10 am
The relevant provision of the New York Convention – article V(1)(a) – can be found in section 103(2)(b) of the Arbitration Act, and states that “the recognition or enforcement of the award may be refused if the person against whom it is invoked proves (…) that the arbitration agreement was not valid under the law to which the parties subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the law of the country where the award was made. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 8:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for such… [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 7:38 am
As we recently wrote, states’ firearms regulations have faced legal challenges across the country since the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
