Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 6741 - 6760 of 8,841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
In last week’s judgment in the case of Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromedia CMR Inc (2011 SCC 9)  the Supreme Court of Canada refused to permit a “class action” for libel by Arabic and Creole speaking Montreal taxi drivers who had been subjected to racist and abusive coments by Andre Arthur, a “shock jock” (turned MP)(pictured right) in the course of a radio broadcast. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:33 am by Susan Brenner
” As Wikipedia also notes, the United States has a federal court system with limitations on the cases federal courts can hear, while each state has its own individual court system. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:56 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The defendant imported various food stuffs into the United States, including pâté de foie gras from France. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 522 F.3d 1299, 1305 (Fed. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:18 pm by AALRR
  Notably, the court distinguished a troublesome decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Wang v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
In contrast, it's really hard to write a persuasive brief that rebuts a position which the examiner didn't even state on the record.The risk of a purely procedural challenge is that there might be something in the reference that you don’t see. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:10 am by Steve Lombardi
Of the 6,000 stores the company operates and franchises in the United States, more than 4,700 are franchised. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm by Bexis
  At least one ethical opinion that we've found also rejects Hall's no-coaching rationale for prohibiting in-deposition conferences.On the other hand, in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by Stefanie Levine
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., 583 F.3d 832 (2010). [6]Brief from former Senator Birch Bayh as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Stanford v. [read post]