Search for: "W W Long"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 13,935
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2015, 12:29 pm
While the strategy will hopefully stabilize contribution rates over the long run and ensure the long-term sustainability of the fund, it will definitely send employer contribution rates even higher for years to come. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 8:15 am
Certainly, money earned from a W-2 job would qualify as “earnings. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:44 am
We are also certain that there will be a chilling effect on some taxpayers who are in genuine need of an appeal, because they believe that their appeals will not produce any long term results. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:44 am
A few years ago, I was attending a conference for the New Jersey Chapter of the International Association of Assessing Officers. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 3:24 am
Earnings releases that simply are too long. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:01 am
[W]hen one is the victim of an attack, the assailant, not the victim, picks the time, the place, the manner, and the circumstances of the attack. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 5:27 am
"Writes Maureen Dowd, who's been looking closely at the Bushes for a long time. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
(James Tyrrell, Bibliotheca Politica 639 (London, W. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 1:09 pm
As the trial court aptly noted, ‘[W]ho would want to go to a haunted house that is not scary? [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
There will be pockets that survive for a long time with rentseeking in place. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:17 am
Session 2: Constraints on Commercial Speech and the First Amendment Moderator: Richard Cleland, Assistant Director, Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection Tracing the FTC’s Line Between Advertising and Free Speech Katie Bond, Senior Associate, Kelley Drye FTC can only go after commercial speech. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:28 pm
Clemency, retroactive drug amendments, and Johnson have forced open long closed files. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:48 am
There was simply [the question of] [w]hat are the rules? [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 2:54 am
Finland has provoked the reaction that this is: “(..) a missed opportunity for the Court to reinforce, in line with its consistent case-law, the special nature and importance of the press in providing transparency and accountability for the exercise of governmental power by upholding the rights of journalists to observe public demonstrations or other Article 11 activities effectively and unimpeded, so long as they do not take a direct and active part in hostilities. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:55 am
On Oct. 26, 2001, President George W. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
The Court did not require the mandatory disclosure to satisfy Central Hudson, but applied something like rational basis review—as long as the required disclosure was truthful and noncontroversial, and not unduly burdensome, it was constitutional. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:37 pm
Washington team’s marks—long time registered, compared to In re Tam where the examiner denied registrations. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:54 am
Simers was long gone.) [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 2:10 pm
Other presidents to have vetoed the NDAA include Presidents Carter, Reagan, Clinton, and George W. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 11:29 am
Three years ago, such a committee voted against approving another long-lasting opioid pain medication, Zohydro ER. [read post]
