Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 13,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2016, 8:18 am
For all lawyers in Ontario called less than 10 years, the breakdown is as follows: % of all lawyers in Ontario: 36% Men: 29% Women: 37% Racialized lawyers: 66% Aboriginal lawyers: 53% When one applies those numbers to the Barristers Act, what this means is that “senior counsel” as personified in Group 1 above is overwhelmingly comprised of white men. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:22 am
EFF argues that the change has enormous implications: What does this surreptitious change from “paragraph” to “subparagraph” mean? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:05 am
Unlike the limitations and exceptions provisions, this is not a limitation or exception as it does not envision the possibility of permitting a user to circumvent a digital lock. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
The opinion itself does a good job of stating the holding: Under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), as amended in 1974, an employer may fulfill part of its hourly minimum wage obligation to a tipped employee with the employee’s tips. 29 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:59 am
It does not accumulate. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 6:05 am
The TPP does not include an exception for private purposes circumvention. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:31 pm
Occasionally though, the dispute becomes more complicated either because the potential litigation traverses unique or different areas of law or because the IP attorney or his/her client wants it to or because his opponent does. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:58 am
It does not apply to employees in supervisory roles, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
The TPP excludes existing local government regulation from the scope of the four big service requirements in Article 10.7 (1)(a)(iii). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
The Securities Act of 1933 does not permit the SEC to bring an enforcement action on behalf of an individual investor; however, individual investors are permitted to bring civil actions under several of its sections as noted below: ■ Section 5 and Section 12(a)(1) allow purchasers (investors) to sue issuers for offering or selling a non-exempt security without registering it. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:09 am
The exclusion obviously covers existing provincial rules (as well as renewals and amendments of such measures), but does not address new regulations. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 5:32 pm
Okanagan Indian Band: [40] … 1. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
They argue that the request does not require Apple to create a “backdoor” to every iPhone, and that Apple will be allowed to keep possession and destroy the software created to hack into the San Bernardino shooter’s phone after it has been used. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 7:20 pm
In an attempt to cure this default, the Republic twice invited bondholders to exchange their FAA bonds for new bonds worth only 25–29% of the FAA bonds’ value. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
This cheat sheet deals only with individual states – no issues of nationwide statutory service of process.To help our readers, we note in each case if it is: (1) a prescription medical product liability case; (2) a product liability case not involving a prescription medical product; or (3) it’s not a product liability case at all. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
” Id. at § 12102(1)(A). [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:24 am
” What does this section do? [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
Under 29 C.F.R. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:30 am
What does this have to do with the TPP? [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 2:30 pm
What Does It Look Like? [read post]
