Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 6761 - 6780 of 7,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2012, 6:17 pm by RI Lawyer
(B) Request for initial evaluation Consistent with subparagraph (D), either a parent of a child, or a State educational agency, other State agency, or local educational agency may initiate a request for an initial evaluation to determine if the child is a child with a disability. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:17 pm by RI Lawyer
(B) Request for initial evaluation Consistent with subparagraph (D), either a parent of a child, or a State educational agency, other State agency, or local educational agency may initiate a request for an initial evaluation to determine if the child is a child with a disability. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also, consider Brownmark v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
This reflects the current law as stated in Chase v News Group Newspapers ([2002] EWCA Civ 1772). [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
The UK Intellectual Property Office considered that the statement of inventorship did not satisfy s.13(2) and consequently the applications were deemed withdrawn ([1]).Dr Thaler appealed to the English High Court which dismissed the appeal for three reasons ([18]). [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner)    Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to discourage… [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:26 am by Giesela Ruehl
Many state courts still apply the Chevron Oil test regarding their own state laws. [read post]
  Salmond and MacAskill were roundly condemned for their remarks, being accused of anti-Englishness and, more seriously, of threatening judicial independence and undermining the rule of law. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  While the Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive regulated the behaviour of communications providers generally, Article 1(3) of that Directive specifies that matters covered by Titles V and VI of the TEU at that time (e.g. public security, defence, State security) fall outside the scope of the directive, which the Court described as relating to “activities of the State” . [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  Punitive damages can, for example, be awarded in defamation cases in the United States. [read post]