Search for: "House v. State" Results 6761 - 6780 of 25,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am by Isabel McArdle
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
” At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro and Gabriel Latner discuss the amicus brief that Cato filed in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
At The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall report that the court reinstated the state’s “maps for its congressional seats and state House of Representative districts, both of which had been thrown out for discriminating against minority voters, ruling … that the Republican-controlled Legislature’s good faith in adopting the lines should be presumed. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
You may also hear references to the Incompatibility Clause which provides, “no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:16 am
"Here is a link to earlier ILB entries on the lawsuit, Hindricks v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:00 am by David Fine
Such communications must use the “magic words” articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:50 am
The result in State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:58 pm
Sharrar v Felsing, 128 F.3d 810, 819 (CA 3, 1997); United States v Al-Azzawy, 784 F.2d 890, 893 (CA 9, 1985); United States v Maez, 872 F.2d 1444, 1450 (CA 10, 1989). [read post]