Search for: "Mark E. Howe"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 7,592
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2009, 6:10 pm
Contact Gerry: T: (516) 487-8207 E: lawmed10@yahoo.com [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
CEO Patrick Byrne, company President Jonathan E. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:51 am
Tip of the OOTJ hat to Mark Jackson! [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Panama Canal Co., 607 F.2d 155, 158 (5th Cir. 1979) (holding that "e dismissal without prejudice of the prior actions on grounds of mootness does not serve as a final adjudication on the merits so as to bar this action"); DiGiore v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:04 am
Here's a great tip from the April 9, 2009 Colorado Bar Association weekly e-newsletter, E-Brief. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 1:26 am
How Did the Anti-Spending, Anti-Tax Tea Party Idea Start? [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
Herr Freidrich Winkelmann found out the answer to that question in connection with his Section 44(e) application (based on a German registration) to register the mark V.I.C. for vehicles. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Patent Baristas) (The Invent Blog) RXP keeps on growing as five more companies sign the dotted line (IAM) How patent vulnerability impacts valuation (IP Frontline) Ensuring quality patents through a rigorous review process (IP Frontline) Ocean Tomo, IP Exchange International launch OTI.com for global IP market data (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Research circles, communities of practice and IP consciousness (IP finance) Trade secrets: front and center? [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
(IP Dragon) (ContentAgenda) Europe Study by Institute of European Media Law: Blanket licence for non-commercial copies needed (Intellectual Property Watch) France French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) France to block Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) AdWords: French first instance court condemns the advertiser: Onixxa v Skin’up… [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 1:41 pm
and their trumpeting of "Marking a Milestone: 200 Accredited Law Schools". [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 7:24 am
According to court documents Quinn Emanuel's courtship of Nelson began when Major Lindsey recruiter Mark Jungers e-mailed Nelson's resume to John Quinn, the founder of Quinn Emanuel. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:33 am
Unfortunately, initial conditions are too different from case to case to simply apply some historical template that would permit us to fully understand what is currently happening, let alone how to deal with it. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Jonathan C. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 12:18 pm
How would this work for companies that need to archive e-mail to meet SEC or other requirements? [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Spicy IP) April Fools’ Day Jokes G20 envisions world IP court; WIPO hopeful host (IPKat) (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Think Tank) (Afro-IP) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (IP Think Tank) South Africa to join Madrid Protocol and drop relative grounds examination (Afro-IP) Albania New trade mark, GI regulations in Albania (Class 46) Australia Full Federal Court affirms first instance decision to remove E & J… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:10 am
" "I know how the game should be played," he said, adding that he demands responsiveness, diversity, talent and cost savings from outside counsel. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 1:05 am
In an interview Thursday, appointed receiver Mark F. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:19 am
NE, Comstock Park, MI 49321-9537 Phone: 616-647-2186 E-Mail: jd@ecobizport.com URL: http://www.ecobizport.com BLOG: http://enewsusa.blogspot.com/ [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:31 am
Here is an interesting article by Bijoy Anandoth Koyitty posted on Reuters about how acquisitions will play a part in the growth plans of some of the larger companies in the e-discovery space. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
The Board here agreed with Hiraga that the additional responses were improper: they were not accompanied by a written explanation, nor was it apparent to the Board how "they avoid any unfairness from what Petitioner submitted. [read post]
