Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 6761 - 6780 of 16,995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
The Board granted the petition of adidas AG for cancellation of two registrations owned by the Christian Faith Fellowship Church for the mark ADD A ZERO, in standard character and design form, for "clothing, namely shirts and caps," finding that the Church had not used the marks in commerce prior to the filing date of the underlying applications. adidas AG v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 11:34 am
Our Los Angeles marijuana lawyers, along with many others invested in medical marijuana rights, have been closely following the developments of The City of Riverside v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:11 am by Kirk Jenkins
Our preview of the oral arguments at the Illinois Supreme Court during the May term concludes with Performance Marketing Association, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:12 pm by David Oscar Markus
This week’s revelations include that the justices originally considered granting only gay, but not transgender, employees civil rights protection in Bostock v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is sort of a punishment for employers who don't pay their people the first time around. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 6:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It involves three people: the victim, Ruth Williams, strangled to death in her apartment; Paul Scrimo, who was convicted of murder; and John Kane, who was present at the time of the murder. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 8:37 pm by Corynne McSherry
Files: lenz.opening.public.pdfRelated Issues: Free SpeechIntellectual PropertyDMCARelated Cases: Lenz v. [read post]
24 Sep 2024, 6:04 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
This post addresses the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Sandeep TS v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 4:25 am
Rptr. 3d 449 (App. 2006), review granted (Cal. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm by Ilya Somin
 (Blackkango | Dreamstime.com)  Today, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
As a provision for establishing standards for granting temporary relief in such circumstances, the Section is concerned about the use of the word “prohibited” (禁止) in Article 10 without limit, and the apparent overbreadth of other parts of that Article. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
” Private hearing and anonymity The Judge emphasised that the information in this case plainly concerns sexual activity between two people, taking place in private. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:06 am by Michael C. Dorf
After an accidental release-and-then-recall yesterday, today the Supreme Court officially issued Moyle v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
There is no power granted to the legislature to remove rights, for any group of people, or for all persons, by writ. [read post]