Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 178,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Plaintiff challenged DSNY's action but Supreme Court granted DSNY's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Article 78 petition. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 10:57 am
According to the Opinion, the case arose out of an event during which the Plaintiff’s child spent the night at a friend’s house at which she was allegedly allowed to consume alcohol at that home and two (2) other homes that were visited during the course of the evening. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:29 am
MetLife (the Plan's claim administrator) approved the claim after evaluating plaintiff's medical records from his physician and neurologists. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
"Plaintiff's opening... [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:43 pm
Your key witness is usually your client, or your client’s representative. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:16 pm
Supreme Court’s 2011 decision on class arbitration waivers in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:30 am
” Taken together and accepted as true, the plaintiff’s allegations “plausibly allow for the reasonable inference” that her age motivated the defendant’s employment decision, giving the defendant “fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon which it rests. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 2:12 am
But according to the motion, Google "chose to do nothing to ensure" that those custodians changed the setting locally.The first plaintiff in this set of Google Play cases was Epic's August 13, 2020 complaint. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm
The decision drew a dissent which argued that the majority’s decision represented a departure from more than 50 years of jurisprudence requiring Section 11 plaintiffs to prove that they purchased registered shares. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 1:01 am
Both the district court and the Eleventh Circuit agreed, noting that the plaintiff’s filings--the only evidence from which jurisdiction can be established--were insufficient to establish CAFA jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 1:01 am
Both the district court and the Eleventh Circuit agreed, noting that the plaintiff’s filings--the only evidence from which jurisdiction can be established--were insufficient to establish CAFA jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 11:50 am
Accordingly, the court found that the substantially similar consumer fraud laws of other states were not applicable to the named plaintiffs’ claims, and dismissed that claim with prejudice as to both named plaintiffs. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:55 am
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment of anticipation and rejected plaintiff's argument that its satellite television patent was conceived prior to the effective date of the anticipating prior art. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:30 am
Defendants sought broad discovery from plaintiff’s Facebook account, to which plaintiff objected in part. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 6:58 am
Defense Attorneys for Employer Successfully Defeat Plaintiff Lawyer’s Motion to Conditionally Certify Class on Grounds that Employees Failed to Meet Eleventh Circuit’s Two-Part Dybach Test Employees filed a putative class action alleging overtime pay violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:37 pm
If you were harmed due to another’s negligence in Atlanta, it’s important to retain counsel. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:32 am
Supreme Court’s June 15, 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 11:18 am
The court agreed with the plaintiff in part, explaining that the jury’s award of zero dollars for the plaintiff’s past pain and suffering was insufficient because the plaintiff presented undisputed evidence. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 11:18 am
The court agreed with the plaintiff in part, explaining that the jury’s award of zero dollars for the plaintiff’s past pain and suffering was insufficient because the plaintiff presented undisputed evidence. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:54 am
In so doing, the court found that Plaintiff's poor work performance was generally undisputed and that a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason existed for the Plaintiff's discharge. [read post]
