Search for: "Roll v. Roll" Results 6761 - 6780 of 6,814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2007, 11:06 am
The imposition of user fees was authorized by Title V of the Independent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952 (31 U.S.C. 9701). [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 4:58 pm
Consider this a cautionary tale about the perils of ctrl-C, ctrl-V. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 6:57 am
As the article notes, maize is "eaten folded in tacos, fried in flautas, or rolled in enchiladas. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 5:52 am
You can look up my favorite footnote of all time, in United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:13 pm
"Finally, with regard to the zone-of-expansion argument, the Board cited Mason Engineering and Design Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:19 am
Accordingly, we might say Article V, in theory, supports the view that here the people rule, while in fact orchestrating a significantly different story. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:43 am
MIPTC's regular readers know that I'm a fan of Paul Levine's writing, and especially his Solomon v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:54 pm
Dennis Crouch summarizes oral arguments for the upcoming KSR v. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 8:47 am
Without such an informal mechanism for changing administrations, the Constitution will indeed become, as Justice Jackson put it in Terminiello v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 7:25 am
HOWEVER, CISCO GOT THE COVERAGE IT DID IN ITS DECEMBER ROLL-OUT PRECSIELY BECAUSE ITS PRODUCT WAS NAMED iPHONE (WITH THE IMPLICATION THAT APPLE COULD NO LONGER USE THE NAME. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 5:03 am
Job 1283 - Court Services Specialist V       This challenging position offers an individual the opportunity to work with Arizona courts by conducting court operational reviews of limited and general jurisdiction courts. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
"They expected the toy train industry to just roll over. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
The conservatives on the right have never gotten over the ‘60s and for years tried, and may still be trying, to roll us back to the ‘50s or even the 1890's. [read post]