Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 21,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2017, 9:44 am
United States of America et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:44 am
United States of America et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
Despite many state laws allowing marijuana activity, the possession, cultivation, and sale of marijuana all are patently illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
Despite many state laws allowing marijuana activity, the possession, cultivation, and sale of marijuana all are patently illegal under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:12 am
The doctrine of preemption is also supported by Michigan Court interpretation of the law (See Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
The court in Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:13 am
Plaintiffs point to McCullum v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:10 am
First Resort, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:43 am
In Google Inc. v Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 SCC 34 (available here) Equustek sued Datalink for various intellectual property violations relating to the manufacture and sale of a networking device. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 5:04 pm
In Gillies v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:18 am
In Jordan-Benel v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:18 am
In Jordan-Benel v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:37 pm
In Roswell Trailers, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:02 pm
Holder (7-2 decision rejecting government’s argument that a state law prohibiting both the sale and social sharing of marijuana is automatically an aggravated felony). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
In Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:10 am
The Supreme Court of Canada released its much-anticipated Google v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:22 pm
The petition of the day is: Steager v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:41 pm
(…) Even regularly occurring sales of a product in a State do not justify the exercise of jurisdiction over a claim unrelated to those sales. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:03 am
Tullis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:23 am
As Lord Evershed M.R. stated in Zamet v. [read post]